9.0–10
Exceptional within its category, with few significant barriers for the intended player.
Index / Scores
The rating closes the review; it does not replace it.
Six recurring questions keep the edit consistent, while the written verdict records the compromises hidden inside a single number.
The six criteria
What we look for
Ratings summarise an editorial view. They are not user scores and are never purchased placements.
| Criterion | Question | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| First hour | Does the game teach its goals without burying the player? | 20% |
| Decision quality | Do choices noticeably change what happens next? | 20% |
| Interface clarity | Can important information be found when it matters? | 15% |
| Platform fit | Does the control scheme suit the device? | 15% |
| Return value | Does the repeated loop remain interesting? | 20% |
| Respect for time | Can a player pause, return and understand the next step? | 10% |
Reading the result
8.8 is not automatically better than 8.2.
A tactical action game can earn a high score and still be a poor fit for someone looking for a quiet mobile routine. Start with the best-fit note, then use the score to compare similar options.
8.0–8.9
A strong recommendation for the right audience, with clearly stated trade-offs.
Below 8.0
Potentially worthwhile, but with friction that deserves careful consideration.